The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.
This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.
A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.
This is my First Post about the types of injustice others including myself have gone through.
Blog This section provides an overview of the blog, showcasing a variety of articles, insights,…
Blog This is my First Post about the types of injustice others including myself have…
This paragraph serves as an introduction to your blog post. Begin by discussing the primary…
Leave a Reply