Truth Project
Justice scales and books

Can a Judge Fairly Decide a Case When He May Be a Witness?

The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.

This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.

A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.

Investigations

Current Investigations

The Truth Project organizes public records, court filings, timelines, source documents, and documented questions for independent public review. Publication of an allegation does not establish that it is true. Readers are encouraged to examine the underlying records and distinguish verified facts from allegations, disputed matters, and commentary.

Current Investigations

The Truth Project organizes public records, court filings, timelines, source documents, and documented questions for independent public review.

Publication of an allegation does not establish that it is true. Readers are encouraged to examine the underlying records and distinguish verified facts from allegations, disputed matters, and commentary.

Judge Scott D. Larson: Recusal and Disqualification

A thorough review of issues surrounding judicial impartiality, inquiries into personal knowledge, procedural developments, and petitions for recusal, disqualification, or case reassignment.

Delve Into In-Depth Investigations Now

Discover comprehensive reports and insightful analyses that unveil hidden truths. Engage with our content to deepen your understanding and stay informed on critical issues.

Explore In-Depth Investigative Stories

Delve into comprehensive analyses that uncover hidden truths across diverse subjects.

Judge Scott D. Larson: Recusal and Disqualification

An examination of judicial impartiality concerns, personal-knowledge questions, procedural events, and requests for recusal, disqualification, or reassignment.

Investigative Report Two

Examine detailed findings and expert insights on this complex issue.

Investigative Report Three

Gain deep understanding through thorough examination and thoughtful commentary.