Truth Project
Justice scales and books

Can a Judge Fairly Decide a Case When He May Be a Witness?

The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.

This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.

A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.

Judicial Inquiry Board

Understand the Role and Mandate of the Judicial Inquiry Board

Explore how the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board upholds judicial integrity by investigating judge conduct complaints and ensuring accountability through the Illinois Courts Commission.

Relationship to This Investigation

This page provides background concerning the authority, membership, and procedures of the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board.

Judge Scott D. Larson is discussed elsewhere on this website as the subject of complaints or requests for investigation submitted to the JIB. He is not identified as a JIB member.

What responsibilities does the Judicial Inquiry Board hold?

Explore clear explanations about how the board handles complaints and maintains judicial integrity for the public’s trust.

Who can file a complaint with the Judicial Inquiry Board?

Any individual who believes a judge has acted improperly or is incapacitated may submit a complaint to the board.

How does the complaint investigation process work?

The board thoroughly reviews all complaints, gathers evidence, and determines if formal charges should be filed.

What authority does the Judicial Inquiry Board possess?

It is empowered by the Illinois Constitution to investigate judicial conduct and refer cases to the Courts Commission.

How are board members appointed and who currently serves?

As of July 20, 2026, the official JIB roster lists: Honorable Kent A. Delgado (Chair, Judicial Member), Ruby Smith (Vice Chair, Public Member), Honorable Amy Sholar (Judicial Member), Jonathan S. Quinn (Lawyer Member), Devon C. Bruce (Lawyer Member), Charles Gunnarson (Lawyer Member), and Megan Applegate (Public Member). Michael J. Deno is listed as Executive Director and General Counsel. Mary McMahon is listed as Deputy Director. Judge Scott D. Larson is not listed as a member of the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board.

Can complaints be submitted anonymously?

Yes, the board accepts anonymous complaints but encourages providing contact information for follow-up.

What happens if a judge is found guilty of misconduct?

The board may file a public complaint leading to disciplinary actions by the Illinois Courts Commission.

Meet Our Dedicated Board Members

Explore the expertise and commitment of the professionals who uphold judicial integrity.

Honorable Kent A. Delgado

Chair, Judicial Member

Brings extensive experience in judicial oversight and legal ethics.

Ruby Smith

Vice Chair, Public Member

Renowned for meticulous case reviews and impartial evaluations.

Honorable Amy Sholar

Judicial Member

Specializes in thorough investigations and upholding judicial accountability.

Jonathan S. Quinn

Lawyer Member

Expert in managing board operations and ensuring transparent processes.

Understanding the Process

Discover how the Judicial Inquiry Board examines complaints and safeguards judicial integrity through a clear, transparent procedure.

Complaint Process

Any person may submit a written request for investigation concerning an active Illinois judge. The submission must state facts supporting the alleged misconduct or incapacity.

After staff review, relevant materials may be provided to Board members. The Board may close the request, conduct further investigation, or—when the required basis exists—file a public complaint with the Illinois Courts Commission.

Under the Illinois Constitution, JIB proceedings are generally confidential unless the Board files a complaint with the Courts Commission.

Initial Complaint Review

The Board begins by thoroughly reviewing every complaint to ensure a fair evaluation.

Investigation Phase

Detailed inquiries are conducted to assess judges’ conduct or incapacity accurately.

Filing Formal Complaints

If warranted, the Board formally presents complaints to the Illinois Courts Commission for resolution.

Find all relevant contact information here, including office locations, telephone numbers, and email addresses to facilitate prompt communication.

Official Sources:
– Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board
– Official Board Membership
– Request for Investigation Process
– JIB Frequently Asked Questions
– JIB Constitutional Authority and Rules

500 West Monroe Street, Suite 600

700 East Jackson Boulevard, Room 305

+1-312-814-5120

contact@judicialinquiry.il.gov