My Blog

Can a Judge Fairly Decide a Case When He May Be a Witness?

The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.

This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.

A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.

Always Active

Necessary cookies enable essential site features like secure log-ins and consent preference adjustments. They do not store personal data.

Functional Cookies

Functional cookies support features like content sharing on social media, collecting feedback, and enabling third-party tools.

Analytical Cookies

Analytical cookies track visitor interactions, providing insights on metrics like visitor count, bounce rate, and traffic sources.

Advertisement Cookies

Advertisement cookies deliver personalized ads based on your previous visits and analyze the effectiveness of ad campaigns.

Home

Let’s Make ’Em Famous

Explore the Record

Investigations

Public Documents

People & Organizations

Current Focus

Judge Scott D. Larson: Recusal and Disqualification