Truth Project

My Blog

Justice scales and books

Can a Judge Fairly Decide a Case When He May Be a Witness?

The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.

This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.

A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.

Judge Scott D. Larson Inquiry

Explore the Purpose and Goals Behind This Inquiry

This section outlines the scope and intent of the investigation into Judge Scott D. Larson, summarizing the key concerns and the framework guiding the review process.

Overview of the Judge Scott D. Larson Inquiry

This page outlines the investigation into complaints filed with the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board concerning Judge Scott D. Larson of Adams County’s Eighth Judicial Circuit.

Investigation Details

Learn about the circumstances surrounding parenting-time restrictions and related judicial conduct matters.

Read More

Allegations and Facts

Examine the differences between verified facts and contested claims in this inquiry.

Read More

Judicial Inquiry Board Resources

Access official information about the Board’s authority and complaint procedures.

Read More

Understand the Judge Scott D. Larson Inquiry Details

Discover comprehensive information on the inquiry process, how to access official documents, and the implications of complaints filed against Judge Scott D. Larson, helping you stay informed and engaged.

Learn More

Powered by CookieAdmin