Truth Project
Justice scales and books

Can a Judge Fairly Decide a Case When He May Be a Witness?

The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.

This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.

A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.

Truth Standards

Explore Our Commitment to Truth and Integrity

Delve into our dedication to upholding truth standards, sharing clear insights into the principles and goals that shape every decision and inspire our ongoing journey.

Commit to Truth and Integrity in Every Aspect

Discover insightful articles and practical guidance on fostering honesty and transparency in your personal and professional life. Engage with content that empowers you to uphold high standards of truth.