Truth Project
Justice scales and books

Can a Judge Fairly Decide a Case When He May Be a Witness?

The pending recusal matter asks whether Judge Scott D. Larson may remain the decision-maker when court filings and record materials raise issues of personal knowledge, disputed communications, and potential witness testimony.

This matter concerns Thomas v. Traeger, Adams County, Illinois, Case No. 2013-F-62. The concern is whether Judge Larson may have personal knowledge of disputed events and may be a material witness, while still being asked to decide matters connected to those events.

A fair proceeding should allow relevant witnesses and evidence to be considered under equal rules for both sides. The purpose of the pending motion is to seek a neutral decision-maker and a full, fair opportunity to present the record.

Illinois Judicial Inquiry

Explore Our Commitment to Upholding Judicial Integrity

This section offers an in-depth look at the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board’s purpose, guiding principles, and its critical role in maintaining ethical standards and accountability within the state’s judiciary.

Comprehensive Insights into Judicial Oversight

Explore critical data reflecting the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board’s impact and effectiveness in maintaining judicial integrity.

Cases Reviewed

An overview of the total number of judicial conduct cases thoroughly examined by the board.

Complaints Resolved

Statistics on resolved complaints demonstrating the board’s commitment to accountability.

Disciplinary Actions

Details on formal disciplinary measures taken to uphold judicial standards across Illinois.

What is the role of the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board?

Find clear and concise responses to frequent inquiries about the Board’s purpose, procedures, and impact on judicial oversight.

How does the Board oversee judicial conduct?

The Board investigates complaints and ensures judges comply with ethical standards in Illinois.

Who can file a complaint with the Board?

Any individual or entity affected by judicial behavior may submit a formal complaint to the Board.

What types of cases does the Board handle?

The Board addresses allegations of misconduct, ethics violations, and incapacity among Illinois judges.

How is the Board composed?

It consists of appointed members representing the public, judiciary, and legal profession to maintain impartiality.

What happens after a complaint is filed?

The Board reviews the complaint, conducts investigations, and may recommend disciplinary action if warranted.

Where can I find more information about the Board’s activities?

Detailed reports and updates on the Board’s proceedings are available on this Illinois Judicial Inquiry page.

Understanding Our Process

Discover how the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board operates to uphold judicial integrity and guide oversight procedures.

Phase One: Initiation

Our board is dedicated to thoroughly investigating concerns about judicial conduct.

Phase Two: Investigation

We ensure impartial reviews to maintain the highest standards within Illinois courts.

Phase Three: Resolution

Through transparent actions, we promote accountability and public trust in the judiciary.

Find contact information for the Illinois Judicial Inquiry Board, including office locations and communication channels to assist you swiftly.

160 N LaSalle Street, Suite 700

200 W Monroe Street, Suite 500

(312) 814-5600

contact@illinoisjudicialinquiry.gov

Who we are the Official Board Members of the Judicial Inquiry Board

The official roster listed:
Kent A. Delgado
Ruby Smith
Amy Sholar
Jonathan S. Quinn
Devon C. Bruce
Charles Gunnarson
Megan Applegate